Two of them, and they share their inputs with the rest of the site: every calorie figure in the
menus is the one the manufacturer published, linked to where we found it. Neither tool rates a
food, and neither invents a number when a maker publishes none — those foods are simply
missing from the menu, and we say how many.
Turns any price and package size into the one number that compares formats: dollars per 1,000 calories. Uses the calorie density each manufacturer publishes, so a can, a kibble and a frozen patty land on the same scale.
Estimates daily calories from body weight and an activity factor with the standard RER/MER method, then converts that into cups, cans, ounces or grams of a specific food using its own calorie statement.
What they run on
187 of the 203 foods in the database publish a calorie density
in kcal per kilogram, and 195 publish a calorie statement in some form —
per kilogram, per cup, per can or per ounce. That statement has been mandatory on US labels
since 2017, so a missing one is a decision by the manufacturer rather than an old label, and we
show it as a gap instead of filling it with a category average.
Both calculators print an estimate with a stated tolerance. Energy needs vary by ±25% between
individual dogs of the same weight, prices change weekly, and neither figure is veterinary
advice. The arithmetic behind each one — dry-matter conversion, grams per 1,000 kcal, the
RER/MER method — is written out in full in the methodology. A
25 lb neutered adult dog, the reference animal both tools use, works out at
692 kcal a day.
We would like to count visits with Google Analytics, which sets a cookie to tell one visit
from another. It is not used for advertising and never sees what you type in the search box.
Say no and the site works exactly the same — we just cannot count you.
What we collect.